Never forget, a 13-year study found that protected bike-lanes led to a drastic decline in fatalities for all road users.
ALL ROAD USERS.
And painted bike-lanes? No safety improvement at all. For sharrows, it’s safer to NOT have them.
usa.streetsblog.org/2019/05/29…
Separated Bike Lanes Means Safer Streets, Study Says — Streetsblog USA
Cities that build protected lanes for cyclists end up with safer roads for people on bikes and people in cars and on foot, a new study of 12 large metropolises revealed Wednesday.usa.streetsblog.org
teilten dies erneut
Darwin Woodka
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •theMamiyaMan 🇺🇦 🇨🇦
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •POUJOL-ROST Mathias ✅
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •Herma 📚 :coffeev60: :tzcat26:
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •Years ago, in Amsterdam, a car was parked on a bike lane that was only divided by a painted line from the car lane and tram tracks. I (cycling) swerved to avoid it. I was careful, but I still got stuck in the tram tracks. I fell, was hit by another car and spent the evening in the ER. Luckily I had no fatal injuries. The arrogant car owner who thought he could just park on the cycle lane went unpunished.
This Old Hiker
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •Matthijs De Smedt
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •No surprise there. Additionally, “Vehicular Cycling” is one of the worst ideas I’d ever heard when I came across it. And I realized how much this braindead idea influenced transportation engineering in the US and Canada.
“Cyclists May Use Full Lane”. As if a sign will protect a cyclist from being hit by a truck.
And I think it made planners lazy and let them design roads for cars, even where plenty of room exists for protected bike lanes 🙁
Hunterrules
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •still can't work out who i am
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •NYC Glue
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •Epistatacadam
Als Antwort auf Brent Toderian • • •